|Source:||McClatchy-Tribune Information Services|
In so doing, he cast himself squarely in the middle of American politics, lashing out at the
“My number one priority is to do what’s right for the American people, for jobs and for economic growth,” he said at a hastily called
Obama used the news conference to try to sell the deal to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for two years on all incomes. He’d wanted to make the tax cuts permanent for all incomes of less than
But he said that Republicans, with their ability to block any deal in the
“It’s tempting not to negotiate with hostage takers,” he said. “Unless the hostages get harmed. . . . The hostage was the American people. I was not willing to see them get harmed.”
While some liberals urged him to fight on, he said that would have hurt the economy too much, as well as too many individual families, including 2 million Americans whose unemployment benefits also would have run out as a consequence.
“This isn’t an abstract debate. This is real money for real people,” Obama said.
By forcing the Republicans to accept an extension of jobless benefits for the unemployed, and adding a one-year reduction in the payroll tax, he said the overall package would help the economy.
“It’s a good deal for the American people,” he said.
“I know there are some who preferred a fight,” he added, but said a long fight that risked higher taxes in the short term “might have been good politics. But it would have been bad for the economy.”
Instead, he said, he’ll fight another day.
“I’m as opposed to the high-end tax cuts as I have been . . . I will fight to end them,” he said. “We’re going to keep on having this debate.”
Before Obama spoke, liberal Democrats were in an uproar. Rep.
After the press conference, Welch warned that the deal would “empower the Republican leadership to fight every last one of our progressive priorities, arguing that the country can’t afford it. Ironically, the president will be proving them right.”
Republicans, however, were pleased.
“I think the vast majority of members of the Republican caucus to the
Obama said he simply couldn’t win his quest to end tax cuts for the wealthy against unified opposition holding millions hostage against a
“On the Republican side, this is their holy grail . . . this seems to be their central economic doctrine,” he said. “We can’t get my preferred option through the
He said he had to settle now because the tax fight only will get more difficult after Republicans add more seats in January as the result of November’s midterm elections.
“It was going to be a protracted battle, and they would have a stronger position next year than they do currently,” he said.
He used that argument to explain why he agreed to the Republican demands now _ but in so doing also raised the question of how he could do any better in two years when he’ll face the same
That will put the tax debate right in the middle of the 2012 election.
“We will have two years to discuss the budget,” he said. “Either they rethink this position, or I think they’re not going to do well in 2012.”
Even as he tailored his message to centrist voters, Obama dumped the rhetoric of bipartisanship.
He lamented that if he wasn’t so committed to the economy and the plight of American households, “I could have enjoyed the battle with the Republicans over the next month or two because . . . the American people are on our side.”
The president also dared Republicans to try to back him into a corner on other policy initiatives, saying that “this is a very unique circumstance” and that “I will be happy to see the Republicans test whether or not I’m itching for a fight on a whole range of issues.”
At times during the news conference, Obama seemed more irked by the critics within his own party than he did with the Republicans.
He compared the tax cut debate to his health care overhaul of 2009, when he felt stung by criticism from liberals that he’d abandoned a push to create a new government-administered alternative to private health insurance. He thought those critics were missing the big picture and should have been praising him for a compromise that extended private coverage to millions more Americans.
“This is the ‘public option’ debate all over again,” Obama vented. “If that’s the standard by which we are measuring success or core principles, then let’s face it: We will never get anything done.”
In such a scenario, Obama said “sanctimonious” people could have “the satisfaction of having a purist position and no victories for the American people . . . that can’t be the measure of what it means to be a Democrat.”
“This is a big, diverse country,” Obama said. “Not everybody agrees with us. I know that shocks people . . . it means that in order to get stuff done, we’re going to compromise.”
To see more of the McClatchy Washington Bureau, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to www.mcclatchydc.com/.
Copyright (c) 2010, McClatchy Washington Bureau
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
For more information about the content services offered by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services (MCT), visit www.mctinfoservices.com, e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org, or call 866-280-5210 (outside the United States, call +1 312-222-4544)